Need help with your Discussion

Get a timely done, PLAGIARISM-FREE paper
from our highly-qualified writers!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

MKG 425 Colorado State University Promotional Plan for Local Donut Shop Presentation

MKG 425 Colorado State University Promotional Plan for Local Donut Shop Presentation

MKG 425 Colorado State University Promotional Plan for Local Donut Shop Presentation

Question Description

Promotional Plan for Local Donut SHop

You will create a promotional plan presentation for a friend’s small business. Your friend is pursuing their dream of opening up their own small business. Since they do not have marketing experience, they have recruited your help. They have asked for your assistance to communicate their business’s benefits based upon the needs of the buyer. This plan needs to be logical and convincing, with a strategy to communicate the company’s benefits in such a way that it will persuade buyers or clients about the worth of your friend’s business product or service.

The success of your friend’s small business is based on your ability to communicate the needs of their target market. One of the best ways you can help your friend is by creating a promotional plan presentation. In the past, promotional plans were seen as short-term ways to boost revenues and market share. Current research has shown that promotion is a direct link between customer loyalty and retention. It is for this reason you need to produce a promotional plan for your friend’s small business.

The object of the promotional plan presentation is to gain experience applying a promotional strategy to help a small business gain a competitive advantage. This assignment will help you apply and integrate all of the course objectives for MKG425. The promotional plan presentation will be completed in sections (these will be Portfolio Milestones that are due throughout the course- see below for a list of deliverables). The final presentation is due in Module 8.

Your final plan must contain the following elements:

  • Promotional statement – Succinctly state your plan’s overall objectives (purpose and need).
  • Target market – Identify your target market and develop the optimal marketing mix to reach your potential customers.
  • Statement of goals and objectives – Explain the advantage your business will have with the integration of the promotional plan. Goals should be specific and measurable.
  • Promotional strategy – Identify the specific promotional activities the business will use to reach customers (advertising, sales promotion, personal selling, and direct marketing).
  • Implementation – Explain the stages and key success factors that are necessary for a successful plan.
  • Timeline – Provide the timelines for the specific promotional activities to occur.
  • Budget – Provide a budget and 12-month income statement (revenues and costs) on the proposed promotional plan. Show how your plan is feasible based on financial projections.
  • Evaluate – Provide details of how this plan is evaluated from success to failure. In other words, provide scenarios or key drivers to help determine the plan’s success.
  • Supplement – At least two promotional designs to accompany the promotional plan. These can include but are not limited to: logos, signage, coupons, print advertisement, social media designs, etc.

Your presentation must meet the following requirements:

  • Be 20-30 slides in length, not including the title slide and reference slide(s). Your presentation should include slides from each of your milestone presentations but with only one title slide and a combined reference slide. It should present as one clear and cohesive presentation.
  • Support your suggestions and information with readings from Modules 1-8 and at least three scholarly journal articles (at least one of which is peer-reviewed). The CSU Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a great place to find these resources!
  • Since this is a presentation, slides should not be too lengthy but instead they should appear concise and to the point. However, a detailed description should be included in the comment/notes portion of each slide, or submitted separately. This detailed notes section should be written in complete sentences and needs to discuss each bullet/point on the slide thoroughly, as you would present the information in person.
  • Your presentation must be well written using excellent grammar and style techniques. Be concise. Be logical. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing. If you need assistance with your writing style, start with Tools for Effective Writing at the CSU Global Library, accessible from the Library’s homepage. Bullet points are allowed on the presentation slides, however, the description/note associated with each slide needs to be written in full sentences and must include enough detail to clearly explain each slide.

Refer to the Portfolio Project grading rubric available in the Module 8 Folder for information on grading details.

MKG425 Mod 8 PP

MKG425 Mod 8 PP

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the selected topic; Includes a SWOT analysis and explanation of results, and correctly represents knowledge from the required 3 peer-reviewed sources to support conclusions.

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge of the selected topic and conclusion; correctly represents knowledge from 6-8 references.

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge and conclusion; correctly represents knowledge from 3-5 references.

20.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and makes a weak or absent conclusion; correctly represents knowledge from 1-2 references or uses no references as justification.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The portfolio includes all of the required components as specified in the assignment; length of paper (9-12 pages) or number of slides (18-21 slides and speaker’s notes); review and critique of three journal articles in Section I.

32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The portfolio is missing one requirement as specified in the assignment: length of paper (9-12 pages) or number of slides (18-21 and speaker’s notes); review and critique of three journal articles in Section I.

24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

The portfolio is missing two requirements as specified in the assignment; length of paper (9-12 pages) or number of slides (18-21 and speaker’s notes); review and critique of three journal articles in Section I.

16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The portfolio is missing three or more requirements as specified in the assignment; length of paper (9-12 pages) or number of slides (18-21 and speaker’s notes); review and critique of three journal articles in Section I.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Student presents a strong or adequate thesis supported by easily verifiable evidence.

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Student presents a thesis with some significant but no major errors or omissions supported in most cases by sound evidence.

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Student presents a thesis with major errors or omissions which is weakly supported by sound evidence.

20.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Student fails to present an adequate thesis.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications and recommendations for addressing the issue.

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant by not major flaws in thought, insight, and analysis of applications and recommendations for addressing the issue.

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant number or major and minor flaws in thought, insight, and analysis and recommendations for addressing the issue.

20.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Provides little thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications and recommendations for addressing the issue.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least 9 credible sources.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates 6 credible sources.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates 3 credible source.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.

20.0 pts

Total Points: 275.0

Previous

Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

We Can Write It for You! Enjoy 20% OFF on This Order. Use Code SAVE20

Stuck with your Assignment?

Enjoy 20% OFF Today
Use code SAVE20