University of San Diego Philosophy of Food Liking and Quality Paper
Question Description
Liking and Quality Philosopher Barry Smith considers an argument for the conclusion that wine quality (whether a wines flavor is good or bad) is subjective. It generalizes:
1. Objectivity about food quality requires agreement in its assessment.
2. Assessment of food quality is based on liking.
3. So, agreement in assessment must require agreement in liking.
4. There is no agreement about what foods we like. (True!)
5. So, there are no objective facts about food quality.
Smith rejects this argument by rejecting premise (1) and premise (2). Explain why Smith rejects these premises. Is there a way of assessing food quality that is not based on liking? Explain.
Min. 2 pages single double spaced
Reading that this is based on attached.
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."